WASEEM AFTAB MANHAS AND ORS. PRANAV KOHLI,SR ADV, Z A SHAH SR ADV vs STATE TH.G.A.D.AND ORS. — SWP/1851/2018
Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 1A. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed as Infractuous on 08th May 2026.
CNR: JKHC020077362018
Filing Number
SWP/6631/2018
Filing Date
11-Sep-2018
Registration No
SWP/1851/2018
Registration Date
11-Sep-2018
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SB SERVICE WRIT PETITIONS ( 100 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS PERTAINING TO STATE GOVT. ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
SERVICE WRIT PETITION (SWP)
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed as Infractuous
Last updated 08-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.WASEEM AFTAB MANHAS AND ORS. PRANAV KOHLI,SR ADV, Z A SHAH SR ADV
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE TH.G.A.D.AND ORS.
Adv. F A NATNOO, AAG 1123
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev KumarView PDF
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the petition as infructuous because the J&K Combined Competitive Examination 2018, which the petitioners sought to challenge, had already been concluded with selections and appointments made. Since the underlying examination process was complete, the petition had lost its purpose and efficacy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
For Orders After Notice
Lok Adalat
-
03-Dec-2018
For Service
Registrar Judicial
-
15-Nov-2018
For Service
Registrar Judicial
-
09-Oct-2018
For Filing Objections/Reply/Response
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sindhu Sharma
-
18-Sep-2018
For Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sindhu Sharma
-
17-Sep-2018
For Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sindhu Sharma
-
14-Sep-2018
For Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sindhu Sharma
-
12-Sep-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Sep-2018
Case filed
Registration No. SWP/1851/2018
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the petition as infructuous because the J&K Combined Competitive Examination 2018, which the petitioners sought to challenge, had already been concluded with selections and appointments made. Since the underlying examination process was complete, the petition had lost its purpose and efficacy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts