RABIA TABASSUM F A NATNOO, SEEMA SHEKHER, SR AAG vs M.A.RATHER C.E.O.DODA AND ORS. — CPSW/459/2016

Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed as Infractuous on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 16-May-2017

CNR: JKHC020077322016

Filing Number

CPSW/17974/2016

Filing Date

01-Dec-2016

Registration No

CPSW/459/2016

Registration Date

01-Dec-2016

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB CONTEMPT PETITION ( 113 )

Sub-Category

SWP ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

SERVICE WRIT PETITION (SWP)

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed as Infractuous

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RABIA TABASSUM F A NATNOO, SEEMA SHEKHER, SR AAG

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M.A.RATHER C.E.O.DODA AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: CPSW No. 459/2016 Rabia Tabassum sought contempt proceedings against respondents for violating a September 2016 court order directing her examination by a Medical Board and suitable posting consideration. The court found the contempt petition infructuous because the Medical Board's opinion showed no severe disease warranting retention, and her school-specific appointment required posting at her original school pending transfer policy. The petition was accordingly disposed of as having no substantive merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Janak Raj Kotwal

  4. 16-May-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 01-Dec-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. CPSW/459/2016

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CPSW No. 459/2016 Rabia Tabassum sought contempt proceedings against respondents for violating a September 2016 court order directing her examination by a Medical Board and suitable posting consideration. The court found the contempt petition infructuous because the Medical Board's opinion showed no severe disease warranting retention, and her school-specific appointment required posting at her original school pending transfer policy. The petition was accordingly disposed of as having no substantive merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case