SUSHMA SHARMA AND OTHERS JATINDER CHOWDHARY vs UT OF J AND K TH S.H.O. POLICE STATION, MIRAN SAHIB AND ANOTHER — CRM(M)/1336/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 12th May 2026.

CNR: JKHC020076382025

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

17th December 2025

Filing Number

CRM(M)/2047/2025

Filing Date

15-12-2025

Registration No

CRM(M)/1336/2025

Registration Date

16-12-2025

Judge

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI

Coram

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB MISC CRIMINAL CASES ( 112 )

Sub-Category

QUASHING OF FIR. ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL CASES (Cr)

Decision Date

12th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528
Rpc Section 341,323,452,147,148,34
Arms Act Section 4,25

Petitioner(s)

SUSHMA SHARMA AND OTHERS JATINDER CHOWDHARY

Respondent(s)

UT OF J AND K TH S.H.O. POLICE STATION, MIRAN SAHIB AND ANOTHER

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI

17-12-2025

FOR ADMISSION Before Notice

12-05-2026

FOR ADMISSION After Notice

28-04-2026

FOR ADMISSION After Notice

15-04-2026

FOR ADMISSION After Notice

13-02-2026

FOR ADMISSION After Notice

Orders

12-05-2026
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir quashed FIR No.92/2016 against Sushma Sharma and others following an amicable settlement between the petitioners and the complainant. The court applied Supreme Court guidelines holding that the High Court's inherent power under Section 482 CrPC can quash even non-compoundable offences when parties settle, provided the offences don't involve heinous crimes, corruption, or public servant misconduct, and conviction probability is remote. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir quashed FIR No.92/2016 against Sushma Sharma and others following an amicable settlement between the petitioners and the complainant. The court applied Supreme Court guidelines holding that the High Court's inherent power under Section 482 CrPC can quash even non-compoundable offences when parties settle, provided the offences don't involve heinous crimes, corruption, or public servant misconduct, and conviction probability is remote. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case