SUSHMA SHARMA AND OTHERS JATINDER CHOWDHARY vs UT OF J AND K TH S.H.O. POLICE STATION, MIRAN SAHIB AND ANOTHER — CRM(M)/1336/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 12th May 2026.
CNR: JKHC020076382025
Next Hearing
17th December 2025
Filing Number
CRM(M)/2047/2025
Filing Date
15-12-2025
Registration No
CRM(M)/1336/2025
Registration Date
16-12-2025
Judge
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI
Coram
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SB MISC CRIMINAL CASES ( 112 )
Sub-Category
QUASHING OF FIR. ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL CASES (Cr)
Decision Date
12th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUSHMA SHARMA AND OTHERS JATINDER CHOWDHARY
Respondent(s)
UT OF J AND K TH S.H.O. POLICE STATION, MIRAN SAHIB AND ANOTHER
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI
FOR ADMISSION Before Notice
FOR ADMISSION After Notice
FOR ADMISSION After Notice
FOR ADMISSION After Notice
FOR ADMISSION After Notice
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-12-2025 | FOR ADMISSION Before Notice |
| 12-05-2026 | FOR ADMISSION After Notice |
| 28-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION After Notice |
| 15-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION After Notice |
| 13-02-2026 | FOR ADMISSION After Notice |
Orders
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir quashed FIR No.92/2016 against Sushma Sharma and others following an amicable settlement between the petitioners and the complainant. The court applied Supreme Court guidelines holding that the High Court's inherent power under Section 482 CrPC can quash even non-compoundable offences when parties settle, provided the offences don't involve heinous crimes, corruption, or public servant misconduct, and conviction probability is remote. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir quashed FIR No.92/2016 against Sushma Sharma and others following an amicable settlement between the petitioners and the complainant. The court applied Supreme Court guidelines holding that the High Court's inherent power under Section 482 CrPC can quash even non-compoundable offences when parties settle, provided the offences don't involve heinous crimes, corruption, or public servant misconduct, and conviction probability is remote. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts