AMIT PACHIALA S/O LATE SH. SURAJ PARKASH DEWAKAR SHARMA vs STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR THROUGH COMMISSIONER/SECRETARY TO GOVT., — SWP/108/2017

Disposed: Contested--Transferred to Central Administrative Tribunal, Jammu Bench on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 27-Jan-2017

CNR: JKHC020073412017

Filing Number

SWP/562/2017

Filing Date

25-Jan-2017

Registration No

SWP/108/2017

Registration Date

25-Jan-2017

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB SERVICE WRIT PETITIONS ( 100 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS PERTAINING TO STATE GOVT. ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

SERVICE WRIT PETITION (SWP)

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Transferred to Central Administrative Tribunal, Jammu Bench

Last updated 27-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AMIT PACHIALA S/O LATE SH. SURAJ PARKASH DEWAKAR SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR THROUGH COMMISSIONER/SECRETARY TO GOVT.,

  2. 2.DIRECTOR

  3. 3.DISRICT DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER,

  4. 4.CHIEF EDUCATION OFFICER

  5. 5.PRINCIPAL GOVR. HR.SEC.SCHOOL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev KumarView PDF

    The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir found that Amit Pachiala's service dispute with the State of Jammu and Kashmir was amenable to adjudication by the Central Administrative Tribunal rather than the High Court. The court transferred the petition to CAT Jammu for full adjudication, directing the registry to immediately transmit the record and the tribunal to proceed after notice to parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    For Admission After Notice

  4. 27-Jan-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 25-Jan-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. SWP/108/2017

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir found that Amit Pachiala's service dispute with the State of Jammu and Kashmir was amenable to adjudication by the Central Administrative Tribunal rather than the High Court. The court transferred the petition to CAT Jammu for full adjudication, directing the registry to immediately transmit the record and the tribunal to proceed after notice to parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case