GAGANDEEP SINGH K S JOHAL SR ADV vs U.O.I.TH.COMM.JOINT DIR.AND ANR. Advocate - SINDHU SHARMA — SWP/2862/2016

Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed for Non Prosecution on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 01-Apr-2017

CNR: JKHC020072952016

Filing Number

SWP/19711/2016

Filing Date

28-Dec-2016

Registration No

SWP/2862/2016

Registration Date

28-Dec-2016

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB SERVICE WRIT PETITIONS ( 100 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS PERTAINING TO CENTRAL GOVT. ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

SERVICE WRIT PETITION (SWP)

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed for Non Prosecution

Last updated 27-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GAGANDEEP SINGH K S JOHAL SR ADV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.U.O.I.TH.COMM.JOINT DIR.AND ANR. Advocate - SINDHU SHARMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev KumarView PDF

    The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the Special Writ Petition for non-prosecution after it remained pending for over nine years since December 2016. The petitioner's counsel had sought time to file a supplementary affidavit on 29 December 2016 but failed to do so despite the lengthy delay, indicating abandonment of the case. The court concluded the petitioner had lost interest in pursuing the petition and accordingly dismissed it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    For Admission After Notice

  4. 01-Apr-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 28-Dec-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. SWP/2862/2016

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the Special Writ Petition for non-prosecution after it remained pending for over nine years since December 2016. The petitioner's counsel had sought time to file a supplementary affidavit on 29 December 2016 but failed to do so despite the lengthy delay, indicating abandonment of the case. The court concluded the petitioner had lost interest in pursuing the petition and accordingly dismissed it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case