MOHD.FAROOQ AND ANR SUDERSHAN SHARMA vs SUNDEEP KR.NAYAK,SECY.AGRICULTRE AND ORS — CPSW/246/2016
Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed as Infractuous on 17th April 2026.
CNR: JKHC020072382016
Filing Number
CPSW/9047/2016
Filing Date
16-Jun-2016
Registration No
CPSW/246/2016
Registration Date
16-Jun-2016
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SB CONTEMPT PETITION ( 113 )
Sub-Category
SWP ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
SERVICE WRIT PETITION (SWP)
Decision Date
17-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Dismissed as Infractuous
Last updated 27-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MOHD.FAROOQ AND ANR SUDERSHAN SHARMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.SUNDEEP KR.NAYAK,SECY.AGRICULTRE AND ORS
Adv. K D S KOTWAL, GA,H A SIDDIQUI SR AAG 1123
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the contempt petition for non-prosecution after it remained pending for over a decade. The petitioners had sought contempt proceedings against agriculture authorities for allegedly violating a November 2015 order directing them to decide on regularizing the petitioners under SRO 64 within three months. With no party present to pursue the matter or substantiate any surviving issues, the court found dismissal appropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2026
For Orders After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dhiraj Singh Thakur
-
23-Oct-2018
For Orders After Notice
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sindhu Sharma
-
17-Sep-2018
For Orders After Notice
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sindhu Sharma
-
14-Sep-2018
For Orders After Notice
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sindhu Sharma
-
12-Sep-2018
For Orders After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dhiraj Singh Thakur
-
21-Oct-2017
For Orders After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dhiraj Singh Thakur
-
19-Jul-2016
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Jun-2016
Case filed
Registration No. CPSW/246/2016
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the contempt petition for non-prosecution after it remained pending for over a decade. The petitioners had sought contempt proceedings against agriculture authorities for allegedly violating a November 2015 order directing them to decide on regularizing the petitioners under SRO 64 within three months. With no party present to pursue the matter or substantiate any surviving issues, the court found dismissal appropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts