NAZAR MOHD MALIK vs UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SCRETARY TO RAILWAY AND OTHERS — WP(C)/3207/2025
Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 1A. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed for Non Prosecution on 04th May 2026.
CNR: JKHC020069182025
Filing Number
WP(C)/5083/2025
Filing Date
14-Nov-2025
Registration No
WP(C)/3207/2025
Registration Date
15-Nov-2025
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SB OTHER WRIT PETITIONS ( 101 )
Sub-Category
TENDERS OR CONTRACTS AWARDED BY CENTRAL GOVT. ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed for Non Prosecution
Last updated 08-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NAZAR MOHD MALIK
Adv. BARI ABDULLAH
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SCRETARY TO RAILWAY AND OTHERS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed Nazar Mohd. Malik's writ petition for non-prosecution because notice could not be issued to Respondent No. 3 due to unavailable registered covers, and no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner to pursue the case. The court found itself left with no choice but to dismiss the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
For Admission After Notice
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
-
04-Feb-2026
For Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria Kazmi
-
18-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria KazmiView PDF
-
18-Nov-2025
For Admission Before Notice
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria Kazmi
-
17-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria KazmiView PDF
-
17-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/3207/2025
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed Nazar Mohd. Malik's writ petition for non-prosecution because notice could not be issued to Respondent No. 3 due to unavailable registered covers, and no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner to pursue the case. The court found itself left with no choice but to dismiss the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts