BILAL RASHID MOHSIN BHAT vs STATE OF J AND K TH. PRINCIPAL SECY. PLANNING DEV. AND M.D AND ORS — SWP/1525/2018

Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 1A. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed as Infractuous on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 30-Jul-2018

CNR: JKHC020063212018

Filing Number

SWP/5391/2018

Filing Date

30-Jul-2018

Registration No

SWP/1525/2018

Registration Date

30-Jul-2018

Judge

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sindhu Sharma

Coram

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sindhu Sharma

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB SERVICE WRIT PETITIONS ( 100 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS PERTAINING TO STATE GOVT. ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

SERVICE WRIT PETITION (SWP)

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed as Infractuous

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 226-Section103 Section 1A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BILAL RASHID MOHSIN BHAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF J AND K TH. PRINCIPAL SECY. PLANNING DEV. AND M.D AND ORS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sindhu SharmaView PDF

    Case Summary: SWP/1525/2018 Bilal Rashid challenged a transfer order (No. 474-DES of 2018) from his position as Chief Planning Officer, Rajouri, claiming it was issued without jurisdiction as it violated SRO 281, which requires Chief Secretary approval for KAS-level officer transfers. The High Court dismissed the petition as infructuous after the State modified the original order (No. 523-DES of 2018), permitting Bilal to continue in his original position at Rajouri, thereby redressing his grievance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    For Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar

  4. 30-Jul-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 30-Jul-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. SWP/1525/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SWP/1525/2018 Bilal Rashid challenged a transfer order (No. 474-DES of 2018) from his position as Chief Planning Officer, Rajouri, claiming it was issued without jurisdiction as it violated SRO 281, which requires Chief Secretary approval for KAS-level officer transfers. The High Court dismissed the petition as infructuous after the State modified the original order (No. 523-DES of 2018), permitting Bilal to continue in his original position at Rajouri, thereby redressing his grievance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case