BALKAR SINGH AND OTHERS JATINDER CHOUDHARY vs KUMAR RANJEEV RANJAN, COMMISSIONER SECRETARY REVENUE DEPTT AND OTHERS — CCP(D)/56/2025

Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section 10. Next hearing: 15th July 2026.

Next hearing 15-Jul-2026

CNR: JKHC020062932025

Filing Number

CCP(D)/4657/2025

Filing Date

16-Oct-2025

Registration No

CCP(D)/56/2025

Registration Date

29-Oct-2025

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh Oswal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh Oswal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

DB CONTEMPT PETITION COP ( 219 )

Sub-Category

LPA ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (LPA)

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act Section 10

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BALKAR SINGH AND OTHERS JATINDER CHOUDHARY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KUMAR RANJEEV RANJAN, COMMISSIONER SECRETARY REVENUE DEPTT AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. 15-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Jul-2026

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh Oswal

  3. 13-May-2026

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh Oswal

  4. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh OswalView PDF

    Case Summary: In CCP(D) No. 56/2025 before the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir at Jammu, the petitioners' counsel acknowledged submitting a reply to the respondents' Statement of Facts but identified a typographical error regarding the calculation date in paragraph 4. The court granted the petitioners' request for time to file a fresh affidavit correcting this error. The case was adjourned to 13.05.2026 for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 05-May-2026

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh Oswal

  6. 15-Apr-2026

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh Oswal

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh Oswal

  8. 03-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh OswalView PDF

  9. 03-Feb-2026

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh Oswal

  10. 22-Dec-2025

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh Oswal

  11. 26-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh OswalView PDF

  12. 26-Nov-2025

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh Oswal

  13. 12-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh OswalView PDF

  14. 12-Nov-2025

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh Oswal

  15. 10-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh OswalView PDF

  16. 10-Nov-2025

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh Oswal

  17. 06-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh OswalView PDF

  18. 06-Nov-2025

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh Oswal

  19. 03-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh OswalView PDF

  20. 03-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  21. 16-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CCP(D)/56/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In CCP(D) No. 56/2025 before the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir at Jammu, the petitioners' counsel acknowledged submitting a reply to the respondents' Statement of Facts but identified a typographical error regarding the calculation date in paragraph 4. The court granted the petitioners' request for time to file a fresh affidavit correcting this error. The case was adjourned to 13.05.2026 for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case