PUBLIC OF VILLAGE BAJNOWA TH JOGINDER SINGH SHEIKH NAJEEB vs UT OF J AND K TH FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS Advocate - MONIKA KOHLI — LPA/251/2025
Case under Clause 12 Section 1A. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 21st April 2026.
CNR: JKHC020062372025
Next Hearing
16th October 2025
Filing Number
LPA/4619/2025
Filing Date
15-10-2025
Registration No
LPA/251/2025
Registration Date
15-10-2025
Judge
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL
Coram
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
DB LPA(OW) ( 201 )
Sub-Category
Other Matters ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (LPA)
Decision Date
21st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PUBLIC OF VILLAGE BAJNOWA TH JOGINDER SINGH SHEIKH NAJEEB
Respondent(s)
UT OF J AND K TH FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS Advocate - MONIKA KOHLI
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL
FOR ADMISSION Before Notice
FOR ADMISSION After Notice
FOR ADMISSION After Notice
FOR ADMISSION After Notice
FOR ADMISSION After Notice
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-10-2025 | FOR ADMISSION Before Notice |
| 21-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION After Notice |
| 20-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION After Notice |
| 15-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION After Notice |
| 01-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION After Notice |
Orders
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir disposed of the appeal noting that the Panch/Sarpanch tenure for Panchayat Halqa Bajnowa had expired, making the matter moot. The court observed that the impugned judgment was rendered based on the peculiar facts and circumstances specific to respondents 8-10, whose predecessors-in-interest were documented as belonging to the "Basith" caste in old revenue records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir disposed of the appeal noting that the Panch/Sarpanch tenure for Panchayat Halqa Bajnowa had expired, making the matter moot. The court observed that the impugned judgment was rendered based on the peculiar facts and circumstances specific to respondents 8-10, whose predecessors-in-interest were documented as belonging to the "Basith" caste in old revenue records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts