AJAY KUMAR AND ORS. B S MANHAS vs H.K.RAZDAN DIR.AGRICULTURE JAMMU.AND ANR — CPSW/463/2017

Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed as Infractuous on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 19-Aug-2017

CNR: JKHC020061632017

Filing Number

CPSW/12824/2017

Filing Date

04-Aug-2017

Registration No

CPSW/463/2017

Registration Date

04-Aug-2017

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB CONTEMPT PETITION ( 113 )

Sub-Category

SWP ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

SERVICE WRIT PETITION (SWP)

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed as Infractuous

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AJAY KUMAR AND ORS. B S MANHAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.H.K.RAZDAN DIR.AGRICULTURE JAMMU.AND ANR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the contempt petition filed by Ajay Kumar & Ors. for non-prosecution. The petitioners sought contempt proceedings against the Director of Agriculture for alleged willful disobedience of an interim order from September 2016, but the main case had been transferred to the Central Administrative Tribunal in December 2020, and no petitioner's representative appeared to clarify the case status after nearly six years. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Janak Raj Kotwal

  4. 19-Aug-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 04-Aug-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. CPSW/463/2017

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the contempt petition filed by Ajay Kumar & Ors. for non-prosecution. The petitioners sought contempt proceedings against the Director of Agriculture for alleged willful disobedience of an interim order from September 2016, but the main case had been transferred to the Central Administrative Tribunal in December 2020, and no petitioner's representative appeared to clarify the case status after nearly six years. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case