SHIV DAYAL VINOD KOTWAL vs KEWAL KRISHAN AND OTHERS — CRM(M) /973/2022
Case under Rpc Section 1A. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 09th April 2026.
CNR: JKHC020059912022
Next Hearing
25th November 2022
Filing Number
CRM(M) /1713/2022
Filing Date
23-11-2022
Registration No
CRM(M) /973/2022
Registration Date
23-11-2022
Judge
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI
Coram
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SB MISC CRIMINAL CASES ( 112 )
Sub-Category
QUASHING OF PROCESS/PROCEEDING. ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL CASES (Cr)
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHIV DAYAL VINOD KOTWAL
Respondent(s)
KEWAL KRISHAN AND OTHERS
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI
FOR ADMISSION Before Notice
FOR ADMISSION After Notice
FOR ADMISSION After Notice
FOR ADMISSION After Notice
FOR ADMISSION After Notice
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-11-2022 | FOR ADMISSION Before Notice | |
| 24-04-2024 | FOR ADMISSION After Notice | |
| 09-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION After Notice | |
| 08-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION After Notice | |
| 08-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION After Notice |
Orders
Summary The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the petitioner's complaint alleging theft by respondents, upholding the trial court's dismissal order. The court found that the petitioner made vague and omnibus allegations without providing essential details about dates of occurrence or stolen articles, and concluded the criminal complaint was actually a counterblast to an underlying civil property dispute, constituting improper use of criminal law to settle private vendetta. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the petitioner's complaint alleging theft by respondents, upholding the trial court's dismissal order. The court found that the petitioner made vague and omnibus allegations without providing essential details about dates of occurrence or stolen articles, and concluded the criminal complaint was actually a counterblast to an underlying civil property dispute, constituting improper use of criminal law to settle private vendetta. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts