AVTAR SINGH AND ANR. ANIL SETHI vs RAJIV MALHOTRA,CHIEF ENGINER,PHE.AND ORS — CPSW/250/2016

Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed as Infractuous on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 29-Aug-2017

CNR: JKHC020059362016

Filing Number

CPSW/8986/2016

Filing Date

24-Jun-2016

Registration No

CPSW/250/2016

Registration Date

24-Jun-2016

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB CONTEMPT PETITION ( 113 )

Sub-Category

SWP ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

SERVICE WRIT PETITION (SWP)

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed as Infractuous

Last updated 27-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AVTAR SINGH AND ANR. ANIL SETHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJIV MALHOTRA,CHIEF ENGINER,PHE.AND ORS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the petitioners' contempt petition against PHE authorities for allegedly defying an interim order to reconsider their pay claim for Pipe Fitter positions. The court found that respondent authorities had complied by filing a compliance report rejecting the claim as meritless after scrutinizing service records against the applicable 1989 recruitment rules. The petition was disposed of as infructuous with no substantive matter remaining. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    For Orders After Notice

  4. 29-Aug-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 24-Jun-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. CPSW/250/2016

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the petitioners' contempt petition against PHE authorities for allegedly defying an interim order to reconsider their pay claim for Pipe Fitter positions. The court found that respondent authorities had complied by filing a compliance report rejecting the claim as meritless after scrutinizing service records against the applicable 1989 recruitment rules. The petition was disposed of as infructuous with no substantive matter remaining. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case