RANDHIR SINGH JAMWAL ASHOK SHARMA vs GURMEET SINGH ADJUTANT GENERAL AND ORS — CPSW/435/2018

Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 1A. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed as Infractuous on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 23-Jul-2018

CNR: JKHC020059202018

Filing Number

CPSW/5047/2018

Filing Date

17-Jul-2018

Registration No

CPSW/435/2018

Registration Date

18-Jul-2018

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB CONTEMPT PETITION ( 113 )

Sub-Category

SWP ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

SERVICE WRIT PETITION (SWP)

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed as Infractuous

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 226-Section103 Section 1A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RANDHIR SINGH JAMWAL ASHOK SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GURMEET SINGH ADJUTANT GENERAL AND ORS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: CPSW 435/2018 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir disposed of the petitioner's contempt petition as infructuous after the respondent-authorities confirmed that the disability pension claim—which was directed to be considered in the April 29, 2016 order—has since been granted. The court permitted the petitioner to file a revival application if any dispute or cause of action still survives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    For Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sindhu Sharma

  4. 31-Aug-2021

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sindhu SharmaView PDF

  5. 31-Aug-2021

    For Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sindhu Sharma

  6. 09-Aug-2021

    For Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar

  7. 17-May-2021

    For Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar

  8. 15-Mar-2021

    For Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar

  9. 04-Mar-2021

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev KumarView PDF

  10. 19-Oct-2020

    For Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar

  11. 07-Aug-2020

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev KumarView PDF

  12. 07-Aug-2020

    For Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ali Mohammad Magrey

  13. 07-Jul-2020

    For Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal

  14. 18-Mar-2020

    For Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dhiraj Singh Thakur

  15. 29-Nov-2019

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dhiraj Singh Thakur

  16. 25-Sep-2019

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dhiraj Singh Thakur

  17. 12-Jul-2019

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dhiraj Singh Thakur

  18. 13-May-2019

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dhiraj Singh Thakur

  19. 20-Feb-2019

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal

  20. 11-Dec-2018

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dhiraj Singh Thakur

  21. 27-Nov-2018

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dhiraj Singh Thakur

  22. 12-Nov-2018

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar

  23. 19-Sep-2018

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dhiraj Singh Thakur

  24. 17-Aug-2018

    For Orders After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dhiraj Singh Thakur

  25. 23-Jul-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 17-Jul-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. CPSW/435/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CPSW 435/2018 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir disposed of the petitioner's contempt petition as infructuous after the respondent-authorities confirmed that the disability pension claim—which was directed to be considered in the April 29, 2016 order—has since been granted. The court permitted the petitioner to file a revival application if any dispute or cause of action still survives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case