GUL AHMED KHAN NANEET DUBEY vs UNION OF INDIA DEFENCE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF DEFENCE NEW DELHI AND OTHERS — WP(C) /2717/2024

Case under Article 226-section103 Section 1A. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 01st April 2026.

CNR: JKHC020058532024

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

18th November 2024

Filing Number

WP(C) /4496/2024

Filing Date

05-11-2024

Registration No

WP(C) /2717/2024

Registration Date

14-11-2024

Judge

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR , HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR

Coram

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR , HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

DB SERVICE WRIT PETITION – SWP ( 217 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST THE DECISION OF ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL. ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

SERVICE WRIT PETITION (SWP)

Decision Date

01st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

Article 226-Section103 Section 1A

Petitioner(s)

GUL AHMED KHAN NANEET DUBEY

Respondent(s)

UNION OF INDIA DEFENCE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF DEFENCE NEW DELHI AND OTHERS

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR , HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR

18-11-2024

FOR ADMISSION Before Notice

01-04-2026

FOR ADMISSION After Notice

23-03-2026

FOR ADMISSION After Notice

10-02-2026

FOR ADMISSION After Notice

12-11-2025

FOR ADMISSION After Notice

Orders

01-04-2026
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR

Summary The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir allowed the petitioner's service pension claim, setting aside the Armed Forces Tribunal's dismissal. The court held that the petitioner's qualifying service of 13 years and 361 days should be rounded off to 14 years under Pension Regulations 1961/2008, which treat fractions exceeding three months as half-yearly service. Following Supreme Court precedent in Balakrishnan Mullikote, the shortfall was made good to 15 years, entitling him to service and family pension. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir allowed the petitioner's service pension claim, setting aside the Armed Forces Tribunal's dismissal. The court held that the petitioner's qualifying service of 13 years and 361 days should be rounded off to 14 years under Pension Regulations 1961/2008, which treat fractions exceeding three months as half-yearly service. Following Supreme Court precedent in Balakrishnan Mullikote, the shortfall was made good to 15 years, entitling him to service and family pension. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case