UNION OF INDIA TH. SECRETARY TO GOCT.,MINISTRY OF DEFENCE vs BANSI LAL — WP(C)/2422/2024
Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 1A. Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed Off on 01st April 2026.
CNR: JKHC020053162024
e-Filing Number
05-10-2024
Filing Number
WP(C)/4098/2024
Filing Date
05-Oct-2024
Registration No
WP(C)/2422/2024
Registration Date
08-Oct-2024
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Parihar
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Parihar
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
DB SERVICE WRIT PETITION – SWP ( 217 )
Sub-Category
AGAINST THE DECISION OF ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL. ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
SERVICE WRIT PETITION (SWP)
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Disposed Off
Last updated 30-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA TH. SECRETARY TO GOCT.,MINISTRY OF DEFENCE
Adv. VISHAL SHARMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.BANSI LAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar,hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PariharView PDF
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir disposed of three writ petitions regarding military pension eligibility, finding they were fully covered by the Supreme Court's decision in *Union of India v. Balakrishnan Mullikote*. The court directed the Union of India's Ministry of Defence to determine qualifying service length under Pension Regulations 1961/2008 and allow condonation of up to one-year service deficiencies for pension eligibility, with compliance required within six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
For Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Parihar
-
23-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar,hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PariharView PDF
-
23-Mar-2026
For Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Parihar
-
09-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar,hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PariharView PDF
-
09-Mar-2026
For Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sindhu Sharma , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahzad Azeem
-
26-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sindhu Sharma,hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahzad AzeemView PDF
-
26-Nov-2025
For Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Parihar
-
16-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar,hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PariharView PDF
-
16-Sep-2025
For Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Parihar
-
09-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar,hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PariharView PDF
-
09-Sep-2025
For Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sindhu Sharma , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahzad Azeem
-
16-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sindhu Sharma,hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahzad AzeemView PDF
-
16-Jul-2025
For Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sindhu Sharma , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahzad Azeem
-
02-May-2025
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sindhu Sharma,hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahzad AzeemView PDF
-
02-May-2025
For Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Puneet Gupta
-
27-Mar-2025
For Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Sekhri , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Atul Sreedharan
-
06-Feb-2025
For Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohd. Yousuf Wani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Atul Sreedharan
-
18-Nov-2024
For Admission After Notice
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ma Chowdhary
-
09-Oct-2024
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr. Justice Ma ChowdharyView PDF
-
09-Oct-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Oct-2024
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/2422/2024
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir disposed of three writ petitions regarding military pension eligibility, finding they were fully covered by the Supreme Court's decision in *Union of India v. Balakrishnan Mullikote*. The court directed the Union of India's Ministry of Defence to determine qualifying service length under Pension Regulations 1961/2008 and allow condonation of up to one-year service deficiencies for pension eligibility, with compliance required within six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts