PARVEZ AHMED MALIK ARSHAD MAJID MALIK vs STATE TH.ENVIRONMENT AND FORESTS DEPTT.AND ANR. — SWP/1257/2018

Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 1A. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed as Infractuous on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 22-Jun-2018

CNR: JKHC020052872018

Filing Number

SWP/4526/2018

Filing Date

20-Jun-2018

Registration No

SWP/1257/2018

Registration Date

20-Jun-2018

Judge

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sindhu Sharma

Coram

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sindhu Sharma

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB SERVICE WRIT PETITIONS ( 100 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS PERTAINING TO STATE GOVT. ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

SERVICE WRIT PETITION (SWP)

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed as Infractuous

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 226-Section103 Section 1A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PARVEZ AHMED MALIK ARSHAD MAJID MALIK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE TH.ENVIRONMENT AND FORESTS DEPTT.AND ANR.

  2. 2.PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS, J AND K

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sindhu SharmaView PDF

    The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed SWP No. 1257/2018 filed by Parvez Ahmed Malik against the State's Environment and Forests Department as infructuous. The court accepted the petitioner's counsel's submission that the petition had become infructuous with the passage of time and accordingly dismissed it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    For Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Gupta

  4. 27-Jul-2018

    For Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar

  5. 22-Jun-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 20-Jun-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. SWP/1257/2018

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed SWP No. 1257/2018 filed by Parvez Ahmed Malik against the State's Environment and Forests Department as infructuous. The court accepted the petitioner's counsel's submission that the petition had become infructuous with the passage of time and accordingly dismissed it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case