IFTIKHAR NABI SUDERSHAN SHARMA vs STATE TH.EDUCATION DEPTT.AND ORS. — SWP/389/2012
Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 18th November 2024.
CNR: JKHC020051032012
Filing Number
SWP/2286/2012
Filing Date
21-Feb-2012
Registration No
SWP/389/2012
Registration Date
21-Feb-2012
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vinod Chatterji Koul
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vinod Chatterji Koul
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SB SERVICE WRIT PETITIONS ( 100 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS PERTAINING TO CENTRAL GOVT. ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
SERVICE WRIT PETITION (SWP)
Decision Date
18-Nov-2024
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 23-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.IFTIKHAR NABI SUDERSHAN SHARMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE TH.EDUCATION DEPTT.AND ORS.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
28-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rahul BhartiView PDF
-
28-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rahul BhartiView PDF
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the petitioner Iftikhar Nabi's application to restore a writ petition that sought approval of a Rehbar-E-Taleem panel, which was originally dismissed in 2024 due to default in appearance. The court rejected the condonation of delay application filed 461 days after dismissal, finding the cause inadequate, though it left open the possibility of revival if the Supreme Court issues directions on related ReT matters. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rahul BhartiView PDF
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rahul BhartiView PDF
-
18-Nov-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vinod Chatterji KoulView PDF
-
18-Nov-2024
For Admission After Notice
-
29-Nov-2013
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Feb-2012
Case filed
Registration No. SWP/389/2012
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the petitioner Iftikhar Nabi's application to restore a writ petition that sought approval of a Rehbar-E-Taleem panel, which was originally dismissed in 2024 due to default in appearance. The court rejected the condonation of delay application filed 461 days after dismissal, finding the cause inadequate, though it left open the possibility of revival if the Supreme Court issues directions on related ReT matters. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts