MADASAR @ JUGNU TH HIS FATHER LATIF UMAR JAVED, NIKHIL PADHA vs UT OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT JAMMU AND OTHERS Advocate - MONIKA KOHLI — HCP/121/2025

Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 1A. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 22-Aug-2025

CNR: JKHC020048852025

Filing Number

HCP/3641/2025

Filing Date

20-Aug-2025

Registration No

HCP/121/2025

Registration Date

21-Aug-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohd. Yousuf Wani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohd. Yousuf Wani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB HABEAS CORPUS PETITION ( 107 )

Sub-Category

OTHER MATTERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

HABEUS CORPUS PETITION (HCP)

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 226-Section103 Section 1A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MADASAR @ JUGNU TH HIS FATHER LATIF UMAR JAVED, NIKHIL PADHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UT OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT JAMMU AND OTHERS Advocate - MONIKA KOHLI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohd. Yousuf WaniView PDF

    Case Summary: HCP 121/2025 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir quashed a preventive detention order dated 22.07.2025 against Madasar @ Jugnu under the PITNDPS Act, 1988. The court found the detention order suffered from multiple illegalities: (1) lack of application of mind by the detaining authority, (2) excessive delay (approximately three months) between the last alleged criminal act (01.04.2025) and the detention order, snapping the required "live link," (3) failure to communicate detention grounds and documents timely in an understandable language, and (4) reliance on unverified DDRs without proper material. The court emphasized that preventive detention requires strict adherence to constitutional safeguards under Article 22(5) and cannot be used as an alternative when ordinary criminal law (bail already granted in two FIRs) is adequate. The detenu was ordered released after suffering approximately 10 months detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohd. Yousuf WaniView PDF

  4. 18-Dec-2025

    For Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohd. Yousuf Wani

  5. 18-Dec-2025

    For Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohd. Yousuf Wani

  6. 04-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohd. Yousuf WaniView PDF

  7. 04-Dec-2025

    For Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Wani

  8. 20-Nov-2025

    For Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Wani

  9. 29-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal WaniView PDF

  10. 29-Oct-2025

    For Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar

  11. 29-Sep-2025

    For Admission After Notice

    Registrar Judicial

  12. 19-Sep-2025

    Registrar JudicialView PDF

  13. 19-Sep-2025

    For Taking Steps

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ma Chowdhary

  14. 22-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ma ChowdharyView PDF

  15. 22-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  16. 20-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. HCP/121/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: HCP 121/2025 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir quashed a preventive detention order dated 22.07.2025 against Madasar @ Jugnu under the PITNDPS Act, 1988. The court found the detention order suffered from multiple illegalities: (1) lack of application of mind by the detaining authority, (2) excessive delay (approximately three months) between the last alleged criminal act (01.04.2025) and the detention order, snapping the required "live link," (3) failure to communicate detention grounds and documents timely in an understandable language, and (4) reliance on unverified DDRs without proper material. The court emphasized that preventive detention requires strict adherence to constitutional safeguards under Article 22(5) and cannot be used as an alternative when ordinary criminal law (bail already granted in two FIRs) is adequate. The detenu was ordered released after suffering approximately 10 months detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case