ANOOP KUMAR DUBEY ANUJ MALHOTRA vs STATE OF J AND K TH. COMMISSIONER SECRETARY AGRICULTURE PROD. DEPT . AND ORS — SWP/1064/2018

Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 1A. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed as Infractuous on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 29-May-2018

CNR: JKHC020046042018

Filing Number

SWP/3966/2018

Filing Date

28-May-2018

Registration No

SWP/1064/2018

Registration Date

28-May-2018

Judge

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sindhu Sharma

Coram

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sindhu Sharma

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB SERVICE WRIT PETITIONS ( 100 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS PERTAINING TO STATE GOVT. ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

SERVICE WRIT PETITION (SWP)

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed as Infractuous

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 226-Section103 Section 1A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANOOP KUMAR DUBEY ANUJ MALHOTRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF J AND K TH. COMMISSIONER SECRETARY AGRICULTURE PROD. DEPT . AND ORS

  2. 2.DIRECTOR COMMAND AREA DEVELOPMENT

  3. 3.DIRECTOR AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sindhu SharmaView PDF

    The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the petition filed by Anoop Kumar Dubey as infructuous, accepting the petitioner's counsel's submission that the case had become moot with the passage of time. No substantive relief was granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    For Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar

  4. 03-Aug-2018

    For Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tashi Rabstan

  5. 29-May-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 28-May-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. SWP/1064/2018

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the petition filed by Anoop Kumar Dubey as infructuous, accepting the petitioner's counsel's submission that the case had become moot with the passage of time. No substantive relief was granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case