KARNAIL SINGH DEEKSHA HANDOO vs H.K.VERMA G.M.TELECOMMUNICATION AND ORS. — CPSW/443/2017
Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed as Infractuous on 08th May 2026.
CNR: JKHC020044482017
Filing Number
CPSW/12122/2017
Filing Date
28-Jul-2017
Registration No
CPSW/443/2017
Registration Date
28-Jul-2017
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SB CONTEMPT PETITION ( 113 )
Sub-Category
SWP ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
SERVICE WRIT PETITION (SWP)
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Dismissed as Infractuous
Last updated 08-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KARNAIL SINGH DEEKSHA HANDOO
Respondent(s)
-
1.H.K.VERMA G.M.TELECOMMUNICATION AND ORS.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the petition as infructuous, having become rendered meaningless by the passage of time. The petitioner's counsel conceded that the case had lost its relevance due to the efflux of time, and the Chief Justice ordered its disposal accordingly without adjudicating the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
For Orders After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar
-
26-Oct-2018
For Orders After Notice
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sindhu Sharma
-
14-Sep-2018
For Orders After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar
-
03-Aug-2018
For Orders After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar
-
02-Jul-2018
For Orders After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dhiraj Singh Thakur
-
09-May-2018
For Orders After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tashi Rabstan
-
16-Mar-2018
For Orders After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ramalingam Sudhakar
-
26-Feb-2018
For Orders After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohammad Yaqoob Mir
-
29-Dec-2017
For Orders After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar
- 13-Nov-2017
-
21-Oct-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Jul-2017
Case filed
Registration No. CPSW/443/2017
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the petition as infructuous, having become rendered meaningless by the passage of time. The petitioner's counsel conceded that the case had lost its relevance due to the efflux of time, and the Chief Justice ordered its disposal accordingly without adjudicating the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts