ARFAT HUSSAIN INTIKHAB H SHAH, R S PARIHAR vs UNION OF INDIA TH. SECRETARY DEFENCE NEW DELHI AND OTHERS — WP(C)/1857/2024
Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 1A. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 01st April 2026.
CNR: JKHC020041082024
Filing Number
WP(C)/3161/2024
Filing Date
01-Aug-2024
Registration No
WP(C)/1857/2024
Registration Date
05-Aug-2024
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Parihar
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Parihar
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
DB SERVICE WRIT PETITION – SWP ( 217 )
Sub-Category
AGAINST THE DECISION OF ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL. ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
SERVICE WRIT PETITION (SWP)
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 30-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ARFAT HUSSAIN INTIKHAB H SHAH, R S PARIHAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA TH. SECRETARY DEFENCE NEW DELHI AND OTHERS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-Apr-2026
For Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Parihar
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar,hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PariharView PDF
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed NK Arfat Hussain's petition challenging the Armed Forces Tribunal's decision that his original application was premature, as the Army Authority had not yet finalized a decision on the maintenance claim filed against him. The court upheld the Tribunal's dismissal but directed the Army Authorities to expeditiously decide the maintenance matter based on the petitioner's reply to the show-cause notice, with any deduction or payment dependent on that final decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
For Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Parihar
-
11-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar,hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PariharView PDF
-
11-Feb-2026
For Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sindhu Sharma , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahzad Azeem
-
14-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sindhu Sharma,hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahzad AzeemView PDF
-
14-Nov-2025
For Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Parihar
-
26-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar,hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PariharView PDF
-
26-Sep-2025
For Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sindhu Sharma , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahzad Azeem
-
08-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sindhu Sharma,hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahzad AzeemView PDF
-
08-Jul-2025
For Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vinod Chatterji Koul , Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sindhu Sharma
-
22-Apr-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vinod Chatterji Koul,hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sindhu SharmaView PDF
-
22-Apr-2025
For Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Sekhri , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Atul Sreedharan
-
17-Feb-2025
For Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Puneet Gupta
-
24-Dec-2024
For Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohd. Yousuf Wani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Atul Sreedharan
-
22-Nov-2024
For Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Atul Sreedharan
-
30-Sep-2024
For Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Sekhri
-
11-Sep-2024
For Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Sekhri
-
28-Aug-2024
For Admission After Notice
Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Puneet Gupta
-
12-Aug-2024
Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr. Justice Puneet GuptaView PDF
-
12-Aug-2024
For Admission Before Notice
Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice , Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria Kazmi
-
07-Aug-2024
Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice,hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria KazmiView PDF
-
07-Aug-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Aug-2024
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/1857/2024
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed NK Arfat Hussain's petition challenging the Armed Forces Tribunal's decision that his original application was premature, as the Army Authority had not yet finalized a decision on the maintenance claim filed against him. The court upheld the Tribunal's dismissal but directed the Army Authorities to expeditiously decide the maintenance matter based on the petitioner's reply to the show-cause notice, with any deduction or payment dependent on that final decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts