KULDEEP RAJ ANIL SETHI, M K BHARDWAJ SR ADV,SACHIN SHARMA vs ATUL DULLOO — CPSW/82/2009

Disposed: Contested--Dismissed for Non Prosecution on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 27-Apr-2009

CNR: JKHC020039502009

Filing Number

CPSW/4670/2009

Filing Date

23-Apr-2009

Registration No

CPSW/82/2009

Registration Date

23-Apr-2009

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB CONTEMPT PETITION ( 113 )

Sub-Category

SWP ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

SERVICE WRIT PETITION (SWP)

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed for Non Prosecution

Last updated 27-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KULDEEP RAJ ANIL SETHI, M K BHARDWAJ SR ADV,SACHIN SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ATUL DULLOO

    Adv. D C RAINA SR ADV,S HAKIM 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the contempt petition filed by Kuldeep Raj against Atul Dulloo for non-prosecution. The petition sought contempt proceedings for alleged willful disobedience of an interim order from 2005, but the underlying case had been transferred to the Central Administrative Tribunal in 2020. After 5.5 years of inaction with no representation from the petitioner, the court dismissed the petition due to lack of prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Apr-2009

    For Orders After Notice

  4. 23-Apr-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. CPSW/82/2009

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the contempt petition filed by Kuldeep Raj against Atul Dulloo for non-prosecution. The petition sought contempt proceedings for alleged willful disobedience of an interim order from 2005, but the underlying case had been transferred to the Central Administrative Tribunal in 2020. After 5.5 years of inaction with no representation from the petitioner, the court dismissed the petition due to lack of prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case