M/S K S CONSTRUCTIONS TH KULDEEP SINGH ANKESH CHANDEL vs UT OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER CUM SECRETARY TO GOVT JAL SHAKTI DEPTT AND ORS — AA/5/2026
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 9. Next hearing: 26th August 2026.
CNR: JKHC020036532026
Filing Number
AA/2747/2026
Filing Date
11-Jun-2026
Registration No
AA/5/2026
Registration Date
11-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Sekhri
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Sekhri
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SB ARBITRATION APPEAL ( 109 )
Sub-Category
ARBITRATION APPEAL U/S 8 AND 9 ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
CIVIL ORIGINAL SUITS/ARBIT. APPLICATION (COS)
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S K S CONSTRUCTIONS TH KULDEEP SINGH ANKESH CHANDEL
Respondent(s)
-
1.UT OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER CUM SECRETARY TO GOVT JAL SHAKTI DEPTT AND ORS
Case History
-
26-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
26-Aug-2026
For Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Sekhri
-
15-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh SekhriView PDF
Case Summary: AA No. 5/2026 M/s K.S. Constructions sought interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to restrain the UT of J&K from terminating a construction contract and outsourcing work to third parties. The petitioner alleged completion of allotted work per tender requirements with proof of submission, but no payment was released; instead, the respondents rejected the payment claim on 25.02.2025 and drafted an MoU to outsource the work. The court found a prima facie case for relief and directed respondents to maintain status quo regarding the contract, issued notice returnable within four weeks, and adjourned the case to 26.08.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. AA/5/2026
Case Summary: AA No. 5/2026 M/s K.S. Constructions sought interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to restrain the UT of J&K from terminating a construction contract and outsourcing work to third parties. The petitioner alleged completion of allotted work per tender requirements with proof of submission, but no payment was released; instead, the respondents rejected the payment claim on 25.02.2025 and drafted an MoU to outsource the work. The court found a prima facie case for relief and directed respondents to maintain status quo regarding the contract, issued notice returnable within four weeks, and adjourned the case to 26.08.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts