PRASHANT JIJYAL ALOK BAMBROO vs UT OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS Advocate - FAROOQ AHMED NATNOO — WP(C) /1607/2025

Case under Article 226-section103 Section 1A. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.

CNR: JKHC020034882025

Next Hearing

05th May 2026

Filing Number

WP(C) /2596/2025

Filing Date

23-06-2025

Registration No

WP(C) /1607/2025

Registration Date

24-06-2025

Judge

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI

Coram

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB OTHER WRIT PETITIONS ( 101 )

Sub-Category

MISC MATTERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)

Acts & Sections

Article 226-Section103 Section 1A

Petitioner(s)

PRASHANT JIJYAL ALOK BAMBROO

Respondent(s)

UT OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS Advocate - FAROOQ AHMED NATNOO

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI

24-06-2025

FOR ADMISSION Before Notice

05-05-2026

FOR ORDERS After Notice

28-04-2026

FOR ORDERS After Notice

27-04-2026

FOR ORDERS After Notice

29-04-2026

FOR ORDERS After Notice

Orders

28-04-2026
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI

Summary In WP(C) No. 1607/2025, the petitioner's examination result was produced showing he did not qualify the written examination for Civil Judge (Junior Division) selection; the case is listed for next hearing on 05.05.2026. In WP(C) No. 601/2026, the court accepted the request to delete Respondent No. 3 from the array of respondents as he also failed to qualify for the Civil Judge post, and de-tagged this petition to be listed separately on 06.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In WP(C) No. 1607/2025, the petitioner's examination result was produced showing he did not qualify the written examination for Civil Judge (Junior Division) selection; the case is listed for next hearing on 05.05.2026. In WP(C) No. 601/2026, the court accepted the request to delete Respondent No. 3 from the array of respondents as he also failed to qualify for the Civil Judge post, and de-tagged this petition to be listed separately on 06.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case