IFTHQAR AHMED AND OTHERS. P N BHAT ANIL BHAN vs UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR TH SECRETARY HOME DEPTT AND OTHERS. — CRM(M)/352/2020
Case under Rpc Section 1A. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
CNR: JKHC020033972020
Next Hearing
29th June 2026
Filing Number
CRM(M)/703/2020
Filing Date
27-10-2020
Registration No
CRM(M)/352/2020
Registration Date
27-10-2020
Judge
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI
Coram
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SB MISC CRIMINAL CASES ( 112 )
Sub-Category
QUASHING OF FIR. ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL CASES (Cr)
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
IFTHQAR AHMED AND OTHERS. P N BHAT ANIL BHAN
Respondent(s)
UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR TH SECRETARY HOME DEPTT AND OTHERS.
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI
FOR ADMISSION Before Notice
FOR ADMISSION After Notice
FOR ADMISSION After Notice
FOR ADMISSION After Notice
FOR ADMISSION After Notice
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-10-2020 | FOR ADMISSION Before Notice |
| 29-06-2026 | FOR ADMISSION After Notice |
| 17-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION After Notice |
| 07-02-2026 | FOR ADMISSION After Notice |
| 19-12-2025 | FOR ADMISSION After Notice |
Orders
Case Summary: CRM(M) No.352/2020 In this High Court of Jammu & Kashmir matter, CRM(M) No.352/2020 was listed for consideration with private respondents marked ex parte due to continuous absence, with pleadings complete and the case adjourned to 29.06.2026. Meanwhile, CRM(M) No.274/2020 and CRM(M) No.322/2020 were dismissed for non-prosecution as petitioners were continuously absent and appeared to have lost interest in pursuing the cases, with all interim directions vacated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CRM(M) No.352/2020 In this High Court of Jammu & Kashmir matter, CRM(M) No.352/2020 was listed for consideration with private respondents marked ex parte due to continuous absence, with pleadings complete and the case adjourned to 29.06.2026. Meanwhile, CRM(M) No.274/2020 and CRM(M) No.322/2020 were dismissed for non-prosecution as petitioners were continuously absent and appeared to have lost interest in pursuing the cases, with all interim directions vacated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts