MANISHA SHARMA JAGPAUL SINGH vs UT OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO GOVT HOME DEPTT AND OTHERS — WP(Crl)/53/2026
Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 1A. Next hearing: 04th August 2026.
CNR: JKHC020033252026
Next Hearing
04th August 2026
Filing Number
WP(Crl)/2493/2026
Filing Date
02-06-2026
Registration No
WP(Crl)/53/2026
Registration Date
03-06-2026
Judge
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI
Coram
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SB OTHER WRIT PETITIONS ( 101 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO REGISTRATION OF FIRS AND REFERRING INVESTIGATION OF CRIMINAL CASES TO VARIOUS AGENCIES ( 22 )
Judicial Branch
OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MANISHA SHARMA JAGPAUL SINGH
Respondent(s)
UT OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO GOVT HOME DEPTT AND OTHERS
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI
FOR ADMISSION Before Notice
FOR ORDERS After Notice
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 03-06-2026 | FOR ADMISSION Before Notice |
| 04-08-2026 | FOR ORDERS After Notice |
Orders
Case Summary: WP(Crl) 53/2026 - Manisha Sharma v. UT of J&K Manisha Sharma challenged a December 2025 order attaching her residential house and vehicle under NDPS Act Chapter V-A, based on allegations that her son acquired them from drug-related income. The Court found prima facie case for indulgence, noting the underlying detention order was quashed on 20.02.2026 and her son was only 15 years old when the property was purchased. The petition was admitted with interim stay on the attachment order; notice issued to respondents returnable within four weeks, with case listed for 04.08.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP(Crl) 53/2026 - Manisha Sharma v. UT of J&K Manisha Sharma challenged a December 2025 order attaching her residential house and vehicle under NDPS Act Chapter V-A, based on allegations that her son acquired them from drug-related income. The Court found prima facie case for indulgence, noting the underlying detention order was quashed on 20.02.2026 and her son was only 15 years old when the property was purchased. The petition was admitted with interim stay on the attachment order; notice issued to respondents returnable within four weeks, with case listed for 04.08.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts