SAPNA DEVI AND ANR RAJAN BHAGAT vs UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR TH COMMSSR SECY HOME AFFAIRS AND ORS — WP(C)/1645/2026

Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 1A. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 04th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 02-Jun-2026

CNR: JKHC020033092026

Filing Number

WP(C)/2481/2026

Filing Date

01-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/1645/2026

Registration Date

02-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB OTHER WRIT PETITIONS ( 101 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS SEEKING PROTECTION ORDERS ( 23 )

Judicial Branch

OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)

Decision Date

04-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 226-Section103 Section 1A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAPNA DEVI AND ANR RAJAN BHAGAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR TH COMMSSR SECY HOME AFFAIRS AND ORS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble The Acting Chief JusticeView PDF

    The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir granted protection to petitioners Sapna Devi and another, who married of their own free will as majors, against interference and threats from the petitioner's close relatives. The court directed the administration (Respondent No. 3) to ensure no harm occurs to the couple's life and property, and to take immediate legal action if they report future threats. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Jun-2026

    For Admission Before Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohd. Yousuf Wani

  4. 03-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 03-Jun-2026

    For Admission Before Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohd. Yousuf Wani

  6. 01-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/1645/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir granted protection to petitioners Sapna Devi and another, who married of their own free will as majors, against interference and threats from the petitioner's close relatives. The court directed the administration (Respondent No. 3) to ensure no harm occurs to the couple's life and property, and to take immediate legal action if they report future threats. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case