KAMLESH KUMAR AKARSHAN MAGOTRA vs UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR TH DISTRICT MAGISTRATE UDHAMPUR AND ORS — WP(C)/1654/2026
Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 1A. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 03rd June 2026.
CNR: JKHC020032882026
Next Hearing
03rd June 2026
Filing Number
WP(C)/2464/2026
Filing Date
01-06-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/1654/2026
Registration Date
02-06-2026
Judge
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI
Coram
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SB OTHER WRIT PETITIONS ( 101 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO LOCAL BODIES INCLUDING AMONGST OTHERS JMC, SMC, BOCA, WATER AND PHE, ELECTRICITY, PDD. ( 18 )
Judicial Branch
OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)
Decision Date
03rd June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KAMLESH KUMAR AKARSHAN MAGOTRA
Respondent(s)
UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR TH DISTRICT MAGISTRATE UDHAMPUR AND ORS
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI
FOR ADMISSION Before Notice
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 03-06-2026 | FOR ADMISSION Before Notice |
Orders
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir disposed of the petition by directing the UT administration to consider the petitioner's request for realigning the Mantalai-Sira-Lothad road to avoid his 8 marla land (khasra no. 513) in village Sarar, Udhampur, which he possesses under an agreement to sell. The court ordered respondents to pass a reasoned decision on the realignment claim within four weeks, with both parties consenting to this outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir disposed of the petition by directing the UT administration to consider the petitioner's request for realigning the Mantalai-Sira-Lothad road to avoid his 8 marla land (khasra no. 513) in village Sarar, Udhampur, which he possesses under an agreement to sell. The court ordered respondents to pass a reasoned decision on the realignment claim within four weeks, with both parties consenting to this outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts