M/S GEES INDUSTRIES TH. ANITA GUPTA vs UT OF J AND K TH. COMMISSIONER SECRETARY, INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE, JAMMU AND OTHERS — WP(C)/1641/2026

Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 1A. Next hearing: 20th July 2026.

Next hearing 20-Jul-2026

CNR: JKHC020032552026

Filing Number

WP(C)/2441/2026

Filing Date

30-May-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/1641/2026

Registration Date

02-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria Kazmi

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria Kazmi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB OTHER WRIT PETITIONS ( 101 )

Sub-Category

TENDERS OR CONTRACTS AWARDED BY STATE GOVT. ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 226-Section103 Section 1A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S GEES INDUSTRIES TH. ANITA GUPTA

    Adv. VISHAL GOEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UT OF J AND K TH. COMMISSIONER SECRETARY, INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE, JAMMU AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. 20-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-Jul-2026

    For Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria Kazmi

  3. 03-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria KazmiView PDF

    Case Summary: M/S Gees Industries sought recovery of an acknowledged payment of ₹14,45,600 for transformers supplied to the UT of J&K. The High Court adjourned the case to 20.07.2026 and granted respondents four weeks to file a reply. Pending adjudication, the court directed respondents to consider the petitioner's case provided there is no legal impediment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 03-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 30-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/1641/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: M/S Gees Industries sought recovery of an acknowledged payment of ₹14,45,600 for transformers supplied to the UT of J&K. The High Court adjourned the case to 20.07.2026 and granted respondents four weeks to file a reply. Pending adjudication, the court directed respondents to consider the petitioner's case provided there is no legal impediment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case