AEJAZ HUSSAIN SHAH BHAVESH BHUSHAN vs MOHD ASHFAQ — CRM(M)/533/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Next hearing: 18th August 2026.
CNR: JKHC020029632026
Filing Number
CRM(M)/748/2026
Filing Date
20-May-2026
Registration No
CRM(M)/533/2026
Registration Date
22-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Sekhri
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Sekhri
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SB MISC CRIMINAL CASES ( 112 )
Sub-Category
138 NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT ACT ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL CASES (Cr)
Last updated 30-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AEJAZ HUSSAIN SHAH BHAVESH BHUSHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.MOHD ASHFAQ
Case History
-
18-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-Aug-2026
For Orders After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Sekhri
-
29-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh SekhriView PDF
Case Summary: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir admitted Aejaz Hussain Shah's petition seeking quashment of a cheque bounce complaint (Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act) filed by Mohd. Ashfaq, finding prima facie merit in the petitioner's contention that he did not draw any cheque on his account and the complainant is neither payee nor holder. The Court issued notice to the respondent returnable in four weeks, stayed trial court proceedings against the petitioner, and adjourned the case to 18.08.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRM(M)/533/2026
Case Summary: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir admitted Aejaz Hussain Shah's petition seeking quashment of a cheque bounce complaint (Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act) filed by Mohd. Ashfaq, finding prima facie merit in the petitioner's contention that he did not draw any cheque on his account and the complainant is neither payee nor holder. The Court issued notice to the respondent returnable in four weeks, stayed trial court proceedings against the petitioner, and adjourned the case to 18.08.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts