ROHIT KUMAR AND ANOTHHER ANJUM ARIF GANAI vs UT OF J AND K TH. COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME AFFAIRS, JAMMU AND OTHERS — WP(C)/1456/2026
Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 1A. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 20th May 2026.
CNR: JKHC020029102026
Next Hearing
20th May 2026
Filing Number
WP(C)/2169/2026
Filing Date
18-05-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/1456/2026
Registration Date
19-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI
Coram
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SB OTHER WRIT PETITIONS ( 101 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS SEEKING PROTECTION ORDERS ( 23 )
Judicial Branch
OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)
Decision Date
20th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ROHIT KUMAR AND ANOTHHER ANJUM ARIF GANAI
Respondent(s)
UT OF J AND K TH. COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME AFFAIRS, JAMMU AND OTHERS
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI
FOR ADMISSION Before Notice
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-05-2026 | FOR ADMISSION Before Notice |
Orders
Case Summary: WP(C) 1456/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir granted protection to two major adults (Rohit Kumar and Simran Sharma) who married by their free will on 07.05.2026 according to Hindu rites. The petitioners feared physical violence and harassment from relatives opposed to their marriage. The court directed official respondents to provide adequate protection to the petitioners' life and liberty, while clarifying this protection does not authenticate their marriage or majority status, and does not prevent investigations into unrelated incidents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP(C) 1456/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir granted protection to two major adults (Rohit Kumar and Simran Sharma) who married by their free will on 07.05.2026 according to Hindu rites. The petitioners feared physical violence and harassment from relatives opposed to their marriage. The court directed official respondents to provide adequate protection to the petitioners' life and liberty, while clarifying this protection does not authenticate their marriage or majority status, and does not prevent investigations into unrelated incidents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts