TANVEER AHMED AND ANOTHER ASIF MEHMOOD MIR vs UT OF J AND K TH. COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS — WP(C)/1457/2026

Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 1A. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 20th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 20-May-2026

CNR: JKHC020029012026

Filing Number

WP(C)/2163/2026

Filing Date

18-May-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/1457/2026

Registration Date

19-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria Kazmi

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria Kazmi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB OTHER WRIT PETITIONS ( 101 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS SEEKING PROTECTION ORDERS ( 23 )

Judicial Branch

OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)

Decision Date

20-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 226-Section103 Section 1A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TANVEER AHMED AND ANOTHER ASIF MEHMOOD MIR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UT OF J AND K TH. COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-May-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria KazmiView PDF

    The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir granted protection to petitioners Tanveer Ahmed and Sahira Banoo, who contracted a consensual marriage according to Muslim rites on 02.04.2026 and feared violence from relatives opposing the union. The court directed authorities to provide adequate protection to the petitioners' life and liberty, while clarifying this does not authenticate their marriage or majority status and does not prevent investigations into other incidents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-May-2026

    For Admission Before Notice

  4. 18-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/1457/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir granted protection to petitioners Tanveer Ahmed and Sahira Banoo, who contracted a consensual marriage according to Muslim rites on 02.04.2026 and feared violence from relatives opposing the union. The court directed authorities to provide adequate protection to the petitioners' life and liberty, while clarifying this does not authenticate their marriage or majority status and does not prevent investigations into other incidents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case