TANVEER AHMED AND ANOTHER ASIF MEHMOOD MIR vs UT OF J AND K TH. COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS — WP(C)/1457/2026
Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 1A. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 20th May 2026.
CNR: JKHC020029012026
Next Hearing
20th May 2026
Filing Number
WP(C)/2163/2026
Filing Date
18-05-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/1457/2026
Registration Date
19-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI
Coram
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SB OTHER WRIT PETITIONS ( 101 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS SEEKING PROTECTION ORDERS ( 23 )
Judicial Branch
OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)
Decision Date
20th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
TANVEER AHMED AND ANOTHER ASIF MEHMOOD MIR
Respondent(s)
UT OF J AND K TH. COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI
FOR ADMISSION Before Notice
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-05-2026 | FOR ADMISSION Before Notice |
Orders
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir granted protection to petitioners Tanveer Ahmed and Sahira Banoo, who contracted a consensual marriage according to Muslim rites on 02.04.2026 and feared violence from relatives opposing the union. The court directed authorities to provide adequate protection to the petitioners' life and liberty, while clarifying this does not authenticate their marriage or majority status and does not prevent investigations into other incidents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir granted protection to petitioners Tanveer Ahmed and Sahira Banoo, who contracted a consensual marriage according to Muslim rites on 02.04.2026 and feared violence from relatives opposing the union. The court directed authorities to provide adequate protection to the petitioners' life and liberty, while clarifying this does not authenticate their marriage or majority status and does not prevent investigations into other incidents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts