AKHIL MAHAJAN SANCHIT VERMA vs UT OF J AND K TH. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, JAMMU AND OTHERS — HCP/31/2026

Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 1A. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 13th May 2026.

CNR: JKHC020026152026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

08th May 2026

Filing Number

HCP/1952/2026

Filing Date

07-05-2026

Registration No

HCP/31/2026

Registration Date

08-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI

Coram

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB HABEAS CORPUS PETITION ( 107 )

Sub-Category

PETITION U/S 491 CR.P.C. ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

HABEUS CORPUS PETITION (HCP)

Decision Date

13th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Acts & Sections

Article 226-Section103 Section 1A

Petitioner(s)

AKHIL MAHAJAN SANCHIT VERMA

Respondent(s)

UT OF J AND K TH. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, JAMMU AND OTHERS

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI

08-05-2026

FOR ADMISSION Before Notice

13-05-2026

FOR ADMISSION Before Notice

Orders

08-05-2026
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir granted a habeas corpus petition filed by Akhil Mahajan, finding prima facie that his marriage to Shahreen Malik (a Muslim woman who married him via Arya Samaj rituals) was valid despite her parents' objections. The Court directed police to produce Shahreen Malik before it on 13.05.2026 and ordered the SSP Jammu to ensure the safety of the petitioner and his family against potential harm or intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir granted a habeas corpus petition filed by Akhil Mahajan, finding prima facie that his marriage to Shahreen Malik (a Muslim woman who married him via Arya Samaj rituals) was valid despite her parents' objections. The Court directed police to produce Shahreen Malik before it on 13.05.2026 and ordered the SSP Jammu to ensure the safety of the petitioner and his family against potential harm or intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case