KANCHAN DEVI RAJEEV CHARGOTRA vs AMIT SHARMA — CM(M)/85/2026

Case under Article 227-Section 104 Section 1A. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 06th May 2026.

CNR: JKHC020025402026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

06th May 2026

Filing Number

CM(M)/1902/2026

Filing Date

05-05-2026

Registration No

CM(M)/85/2026

Registration Date

05-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI

Coram

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB PETITIONS U/S 104 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR – CM(M) ( 129 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST AN INTERIM ORDER ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL CASES (C)

Decision Date

06th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

Article 227-Section 104 Section 1A

Petitioner(s)

KANCHAN DEVI RAJEEV CHARGOTRA

Respondent(s)

AMIT SHARMA

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI

06-05-2026

FOR ADMISSION Before Notice

Orders

06-05-2026
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir set aside the lower court's procedural approach in a divorce case, holding that the Principal District Judge, Samba erred by treating the matrimonial petition as routine civil litigation without attempting reconciliation or mediation as mandated under Section 23(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and Order 32-A of the CPC. The court remanded the case, directing the trial court to first undertake reconciliation/mediation efforts before proceeding to adjudication on merits, emphasizing that such initiatives must occur at the inception of matrimonial proceedings rather than after pleadings are exchanged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir set aside the lower court's procedural approach in a divorce case, holding that the Principal District Judge, Samba erred by treating the matrimonial petition as routine civil litigation without attempting reconciliation or mediation as mandated under Section 23(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and Order 32-A of the CPC. The court remanded the case, directing the trial court to first undertake reconciliation/mediation efforts before proceeding to adjudication on merits, emphasizing that such initiatives must occur at the inception of matrimonial proceedings rather than after pleadings are exchanged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case