DIL MOHD AND OTHERS RANJEEV DUBEY vs UT OF J AND K TH. COMMISSIONER SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS Advocate - MONIKA KOHLI — WP(C)/1302/2026

Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 1A. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.

Next hearing 07-Jul-2026

CNR: JKHC020025252026

Filing Number

WP(C)/1889/2026

Filing Date

04-May-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/1302/2026

Registration Date

07-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria Kazmi

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria Kazmi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB OTHER WRIT PETITIONS ( 101 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO REVENUE LAWS ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 226-Section103 Section 1A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DIL MOHD AND OTHERS RANJEEV DUBEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UT OF J AND K TH. COMMISSIONER SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS Advocate - MONIKA KOHLI

Case History

  1. 07-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Jul-2026

    For Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria Kazmi

  3. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria KazmiView PDF

    Case Summary: WP(C) 1302/2026 The petition challenges an appellate order dated 25.02.2026 that dismissed petitioners' appeal and upheld a 1991 Tehsildar order. The petitioners' appeal was rejected citing a 33-year delay, though they claim the delay was explained. The court adjourned the matter to 07.07.2026, granted respondents four weeks to file reply, issued notice to remaining respondents, and directed parties to maintain status quo regarding the property pending next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 08-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 04-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/1302/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(C) 1302/2026 The petition challenges an appellate order dated 25.02.2026 that dismissed petitioners' appeal and upheld a 1991 Tehsildar order. The petitioners' appeal was rejected citing a 33-year delay, though they claim the delay was explained. The court adjourned the matter to 07.07.2026, granted respondents four weeks to file reply, issued notice to remaining respondents, and directed parties to maintain status quo regarding the property pending next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case