NEHAL SINGH MANHAS VIKAS SHARMA vs UT OF J AND K TH. COMMISSIONER SECRETARY, P.H.E., IRIGATION AND FLOOD CONTROL, JAMMU AND OTHERS Advocate - MONIKA KOHLI — WP(C)/1276/2026
Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 1A. Next hearing: 21st September 2026.
CNR: JKHC020025202026
Filing Number
WP(C)/1884/2026
Filing Date
04-May-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/1276/2026
Registration Date
06-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohd. Yousuf Wani
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohd. Yousuf Wani
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SB OTHER WRIT PETITIONS ( 101 )
Sub-Category
TENDERS OR CONTRACTS AWARDED BY STATE GOVT. ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)
Last updated 08-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NEHAL SINGH MANHAS VIKAS SHARMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.UT OF J AND K TH. COMMISSIONER SECRETARY, P.H.E., IRIGATION AND FLOOD CONTROL, JAMMU AND OTHERS Advocate - MONIKA KOHLI
Case History
-
21-Sep-2026
Next hearingPending
-
21-Sep-2026
For Taking Steps
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohd. Yousuf Wani
-
03-Jul-2026
For Taking Steps
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohd. Yousuf Wani
-
06-Jun-2026
For Taking Steps
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohd. Yousuf Wani
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohd. Yousuf WaniView PDF
Case Summary: WP(C) 1276/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir issued notice to respondents and granted interim relief to contractor Nehal Singh Manhas. The court directed the UT of J&K to make payment for irrigation works executed by the petitioner, despite procedural irregularities admitted by the Executive Engineer. The petitioner must furnish an undertaking to reimburse amounts if subsequently deemed ineligible. Case adjourned to 06.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/1276/2026
Case Summary: WP(C) 1276/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir issued notice to respondents and granted interim relief to contractor Nehal Singh Manhas. The court directed the UT of J&K to make payment for irrigation works executed by the petitioner, despite procedural irregularities admitted by the Executive Engineer. The petitioner must furnish an undertaking to reimburse amounts if subsequently deemed ineligible. Case adjourned to 06.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts