MADAN LAL AND ANOTHER A R KHAN vs UT OF J AND K TH. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT Advocate - MONIKA KOHLI — WP(C)/1300/2026

Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 1A. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 08-May-2026

CNR: JKHC020025142026

Filing Number

WP(C)/1880/2026

Filing Date

04-May-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/1300/2026

Registration Date

07-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria Kazmi

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria Kazmi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB OTHER WRIT PETITIONS ( 101 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS SEEKING PROTECTION ORDERS ( 23 )

Judicial Branch

OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 226-Section103 Section 1A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MADAN LAL AND ANOTHER A R KHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UT OF J AND K TH. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT Advocate - MONIKA KOHLI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria KazmiView PDF

    Case Summary: WP(C) No. 1300/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir directed authorities to provide adequate protection to two major adults (married on 22.12.2021 per Hindu rites) against apprehended violence and harassment from relatives opposing their marriage. The court clarified this protection order does not authenticate the marriage or their majority status, and does not prevent investigations into other incidents involving the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    For Admission Before Notice

  4. 04-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/1300/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(C) No. 1300/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir directed authorities to provide adequate protection to two major adults (married on 22.12.2021 per Hindu rites) against apprehended violence and harassment from relatives opposing their marriage. The court clarified this protection order does not authenticate the marriage or their majority status, and does not prevent investigations into other incidents involving the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case