NAHIDAH AKHTER AND ANOTHER MASOOD AHMED vs UT OF J AND K TH. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, JAMMU AND OTHERS Advocate - MONIKA KOHLI — WP(C)/1263/2026

Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 1A. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 05-May-2026

CNR: JKHC020025132026

Filing Number

WP(C)/1879/2026

Filing Date

04-May-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/1263/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohd. Yousuf Wani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohd. Yousuf Wani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB OTHER WRIT PETITIONS ( 101 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS SEEKING PROTECTION ORDERS ( 23 )

Judicial Branch

OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 226-Section103 Section 1A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NAHIDAH AKHTER AND ANOTHER MASOOD AHMED

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UT OF J AND K TH. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, JAMMU AND OTHERS Advocate - MONIKA KOHLI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    For Admission Before Notice

  3. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohd. Yousuf WaniView PDF

    The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir disposed of the petition and directed official respondents (police) to ensure no unjustified harassment of the petitioners and provide protection as requested, while private respondents (family members) must cease illegal harassment. The court clarified its order does not constitute an opinion on the validity of the alleged marriage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 04-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/1263/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir disposed of the petition and directed official respondents (police) to ensure no unjustified harassment of the petitioners and provide protection as requested, while private respondents (family members) must cease illegal harassment. The court clarified its order does not constitute an opinion on the validity of the alleged marriage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case