SEHREEN KOSSER AND ANOTHER AMJED HUSSAIN vs UT OF J AND K TH. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS Advocate - MONIKA KOHLI — WP(C)/1287/2026

Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 1A. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 08-May-2026

CNR: JKHC020024772026

Filing Number

WP(C)/1853/2026

Filing Date

02-May-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/1287/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohd. Yousuf Wani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohd. Yousuf Wani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB OTHER WRIT PETITIONS ( 101 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS SEEKING PROTECTION ORDERS ( 23 )

Judicial Branch

OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 226-Section103 Section 1A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SEHREEN KOSSER AND ANOTHER AMJED HUSSAIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UT OF J AND K TH. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS Advocate - MONIKA KOHLI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohd. Yousuf WaniView PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir disposed of a petition by two majors (married by Nikah on April 30, 2026) seeking protection from threats by the bride's family members and police interference. The court directed official respondents to prevent unjustified harassment and provide protection when requested, and ordered private respondents to cease illegal harassment. However, the court clarified this order does not constitute an opinion on the marriage's validity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    For Admission Before Notice

  4. 02-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/1287/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir disposed of a petition by two majors (married by Nikah on April 30, 2026) seeking protection from threats by the bride's family members and police interference. The court directed official respondents to prevent unjustified harassment and provide protection when requested, and ordered private respondents to cease illegal harassment. However, the court clarified this order does not constitute an opinion on the marriage's validity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case