YASMEEN CHOUDHARY AND ANOTHER M ZULKARNAIN CHOWDHARY vs UT OF J AND K TH. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS Advocate - MONIKA KOHLI — WP(C)/1251/2026

Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 1A. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 05-May-2026

CNR: JKHC020024542026

Filing Number

WP(C)/1835/2026

Filing Date

30-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/1251/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria Kazmi

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria Kazmi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB OTHER WRIT PETITIONS ( 101 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS SEEKING PROTECTION ORDERS ( 23 )

Judicial Branch

OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 226-Section103 Section 1A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.YASMEEN CHOUDHARY AND ANOTHER M ZULKARNAIN CHOWDHARY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UT OF J AND K TH. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS Advocate - MONIKA KOHLI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria KazmiView PDF

    The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir granted protection to two major petitioners who married on 30.04.2026 according to Muslim Personal Law, directing authorities to provide adequate security against anticipated violence and harassment from relatives opposing the marriage. The court clarified that this protection order neither authenticates the marriage nor their majority status, and authorities may continue investigating any other cases registered against them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    For Admission Before Notice

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/1251/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir granted protection to two major petitioners who married on 30.04.2026 according to Muslim Personal Law, directing authorities to provide adequate security against anticipated violence and harassment from relatives opposing the marriage. The court clarified that this protection order neither authenticates the marriage nor their majority status, and authorities may continue investigating any other cases registered against them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case