HILAL AHMAD TANTARY MOHAMMAD ASHRAF MALIK vs UNION OF INDIA TH. PRINCIPAL SECURITY COMMISSIONER, RAILWAY PROTECTION FORCE, NEW DELHI AND OTHERS — WP(C)/1217/2026
Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 1A. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.
CNR: JKHC020024282026
Filing Number
WP(C)/1816/2026
Filing Date
30-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/1217/2026
Registration Date
30-Apr-2026
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SB SERVICE WRIT PETITIONS ( 100 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS PERTAINING TO CENTRAL GOVT. ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
SERVICE WRIT PETITION (SWP)
Last updated 08-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HILAL AHMAD TANTARY MOHAMMAD ASHRAF MALIK
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA TH. PRINCIPAL SECURITY COMMISSIONER, RAILWAY PROTECTION FORCE, NEW DELHI AND OTHERS
Case History
-
07-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Jul-2026
For Taking Steps
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rahul Bharti
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rahul BhartiView PDF
Case Summary: WP(C) 1217/2026 Outcome: Case adjourned pending hearing. The court issued notice to respondents and directed the petitioner to respond to departmental proceedings, but imposed an interim restraint prohibiting the RPF from passing any final departmental order without prior court permission. Key Facts: RPF Head Constable Hilal Ahmad Tantary challenged criminal charges (fraud involving Rs. 4 lakh for promised employment) and concurrent departmental disciplinary proceedings. The petitioner argued that criminal and departmental proceedings with identical accusations cannot proceed simultaneously and the departmental action is vitiated. Next Date: 07.07.2026 This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
For Admission Before Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rahul Bharti
-
30-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/1217/2026
Case Summary: WP(C) 1217/2026 Outcome: Case adjourned pending hearing. The court issued notice to respondents and directed the petitioner to respond to departmental proceedings, but imposed an interim restraint prohibiting the RPF from passing any final departmental order without prior court permission. Key Facts: RPF Head Constable Hilal Ahmad Tantary challenged criminal charges (fraud involving Rs. 4 lakh for promised employment) and concurrent departmental disciplinary proceedings. The petitioner argued that criminal and departmental proceedings with identical accusations cannot proceed simultaneously and the departmental action is vitiated. Next Date: 07.07.2026 This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts