JAMEET SINGH AND OTHERS K L PANDITA vs UT OF J AND K TH. COMMISSIONER SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS Advocate - MONIKA KOHLI — WP(C)/1227/2026
Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 1A. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 04th May 2026.
CNR: JKHC020024032026
Filing Number
WP(C)/1797/2026
Filing Date
29-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/1227/2026
Registration Date
02-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohd. Yousuf Wani
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohd. Yousuf Wani
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SB OTHER WRIT PETITIONS ( 101 )
Sub-Category
_LAND ACQUISITION AND REQUISITION_ MATTERS ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 08-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JAMEET SINGH AND OTHERS K L PANDITA
Respondent(s)
-
1.UT OF J AND K TH. COMMISSIONER SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS Advocate - MONIKA KOHLI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohd. Yousuf WaniView PDF
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir disposed of the petition, directing the School Education Department to cease interference with the petitioners' ancestral land (Khasra Nos. 102, 103, 383) in Village Khawas, Rajouri. The court held that the department's reconstruction activities must remain confined to previously acquired land (Khasra Nos. 99, 99/1, 100, 101) under the 1995 acquisition award, and any future acquisition of the petitioners' land requires formal acquisition proceedings in accordance with applicable law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
For Admission Before Notice
-
29-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/1227/2026
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir disposed of the petition, directing the School Education Department to cease interference with the petitioners' ancestral land (Khasra Nos. 102, 103, 383) in Village Khawas, Rajouri. The court held that the department's reconstruction activities must remain confined to previously acquired land (Khasra Nos. 99, 99/1, 100, 101) under the 1995 acquisition award, and any future acquisition of the petitioners' land requires formal acquisition proceedings in accordance with applicable law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts