RAMAN SINGH BHAU AND OTHERS SUNIL KHAJURIA vs UT OF J AND K TH. PRINCIAPL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS Advocate - MONIKA KOHLI — WP(C)/1265/2026
Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 1A. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.
CNR: JKHC020023972026
Filing Number
WP(C)/1792/2026
Filing Date
29-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/1265/2026
Registration Date
05-May-2026
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SB SERVICE WRIT PETITIONS ( 100 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS PERTAINING TO STATE GOVT. ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
SERVICE WRIT PETITION (SWP)
Last updated 08-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAMAN SINGH BHAU AND OTHERS SUNIL KHAJURIA
Respondent(s)
-
1.UT OF J AND K TH. PRINCIAPL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS Advocate - MONIKA KOHLI
Case History
-
07-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Jul-2026
For Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rahul Bharti
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rahul BhartiView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir issued notice to respondents in a writ petition filed by Raman Singh Bhau and others challenging Home Guards engagement matters under the Jammu and Kashmir Home Guards Act, 2006. The court directed that petitioners not be disengaged from their Home Guards status pending the next hearing (07.07.2026), acknowledging their six years of service and the government's discretionary power to extend their engagement under Section 3 of the Act. Reply/objections were ordered to be filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/1265/2026
Summary: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir issued notice to respondents in a writ petition filed by Raman Singh Bhau and others challenging Home Guards engagement matters under the Jammu and Kashmir Home Guards Act, 2006. The court directed that petitioners not be disengaged from their Home Guards status pending the next hearing (07.07.2026), acknowledging their six years of service and the government's discretionary power to extend their engagement under Section 3 of the Act. Reply/objections were ordered to be filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts