MOHD BASHIR MUZZAFAR IQBAL KHAN vs UNION OF INDIA TH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS NEW DELHI AND OTHERS — WP(C)/1234/2026
Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 1A. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
CNR: JKHC020023612026
Filing Number
WP(C)/1761/2026
Filing Date
27-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/1234/2026
Registration Date
02-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rahul Bharti
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rahul Bharti
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SB SERVICE WRIT PETITIONS ( 100 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS PERTAINING TO CENTRAL GOVT. ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
SERVICE WRIT PETITION (SWP)
Last updated 08-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MOHD BASHIR MUZZAFAR IQBAL KHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA TH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS NEW DELHI AND OTHERS
Case History
-
29-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
29-Jun-2026
For Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rahul Bharti
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rahul BhartiView PDF
Case Summary: WP(C) 1234/2026 The case was adjourned for hearing on 29.06.2026. Mohd. Bashir, a former CRPF Constable dismissed in 1999, sought a writ of mandamus for release and disbursement of his pension benefits and arrears from June 2022. After earlier favorable judgments (2009, 2018), a disciplinary inquiry concluded in April 2022 imposing a 30% permanent pension cut. The High Court ordered respondents to file a reply within six weeks while directing them to proceed with pension settlement independently, without waiting for the petition's outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/1234/2026
Case Summary: WP(C) 1234/2026 The case was adjourned for hearing on 29.06.2026. Mohd. Bashir, a former CRPF Constable dismissed in 1999, sought a writ of mandamus for release and disbursement of his pension benefits and arrears from June 2022. After earlier favorable judgments (2009, 2018), a disciplinary inquiry concluded in April 2022 imposing a 30% permanent pension cut. The High Court ordered respondents to file a reply within six weeks while directing them to proceed with pension settlement independently, without waiting for the petition's outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts