JASMEET KOUR AND ANOTHER ASHISH SHARMA vs UT OF J AND K TH. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS Advocate - MONIKA KOHLI — WP(C)/1280/2026
Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 1A. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.
CNR: JKHC020023522026
Filing Number
WP(C)/1755/2026
Filing Date
27-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/1280/2026
Registration Date
06-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohd. Yousuf Wani
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohd. Yousuf Wani
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SB OTHER WRIT PETITIONS ( 101 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS SEEKING PROTECTION ORDERS ( 23 )
Judicial Branch
OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 08-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JASMEET KOUR AND ANOTHER ASHISH SHARMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.UT OF J AND K TH. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS Advocate - MONIKA KOHLI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohd. Yousuf WaniView PDF
Case Summary: WP(C) 1280/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir granted protection to two major adults (Jasmeet Kour, DOB 10.03.2008, and Aman Deep Singh, DOB 10.02.2004) who contracted marriage in 2026 out of free will and choice. The court directed official respondents to ensure no unjustified harassment and provide protection as requested, and restrained the petitioner's father from causing illegal harassment. However, the court clarified this order does not constitute an opinion on the validity of the marriage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
For Admission Before Notice
-
27-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/1280/2026
Case Summary: WP(C) 1280/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir granted protection to two major adults (Jasmeet Kour, DOB 10.03.2008, and Aman Deep Singh, DOB 10.02.2004) who contracted marriage in 2026 out of free will and choice. The court directed official respondents to ensure no unjustified harassment and provide protection as requested, and restrained the petitioner's father from causing illegal harassment. However, the court clarified this order does not constitute an opinion on the validity of the marriage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts