JOGINDER SINGH AND OTHERS AJAY KUMAR vs SURESH KOHLI AND OTHJERS — CM(M)/80/2026
Case under Article 227-Section 104 Section 1A. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 04th May 2026.
CNR: JKHC020022272026
Next Hearing
04th May 2026
Filing Number
CM(M)/1656/2026
Filing Date
21-04-2026
Registration No
CM(M)/80/2026
Registration Date
30-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI
Coram
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SB PETITIONS U/S 104 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR – CM(M) ( 129 )
Sub-Category
AGAINST AN INTERIM ORDER ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
CIVIL CASES (C)
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JOGINDER SINGH AND OTHERS AJAY KUMAR
Respondent(s)
SURESH KOHLI AND OTHJERS
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI
FOR ADMISSION Before Notice
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION Before Notice |
Orders
SUMMARY: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the petitioners' supervisory jurisdiction petition challenging the lower courts' rejection of their temporary injunction application in a civil suit seeking permanent prohibitory injunction. The court found the petition deficient as the petitioners failed to annex essential pleadings (plaint, written statement, and appeal memo) in certified form as required under Article 227 of the Constitution, and declined to grant indulgence due to non-compliance with procedural requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the petitioners' supervisory jurisdiction petition challenging the lower courts' rejection of their temporary injunction application in a civil suit seeking permanent prohibitory injunction. The court found the petition deficient as the petitioners failed to annex essential pleadings (plaint, written statement, and appeal memo) in certified form as required under Article 227 of the Constitution, and declined to grant indulgence due to non-compliance with procedural requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts