ROHIT KUMAR vs J AND K GRAMEEN BANK, TH. CHAIRMAN, JAMMU AND OTHERS — WP(C)/1221/2026
Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 1A. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
CNR: JKHC020021072026
Filing Number
WP(C)/1560/2026
Filing Date
18-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/1221/2026
Registration Date
30-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rahul Bharti
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rahul Bharti
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SB SERVICE WRIT PETITIONS ( 100 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS PERTAINING TO PUBLIC CORP. AND GOVT. UNDERTAKINGS. ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
SERVICE WRIT PETITION (SWP)
Last updated 08-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ROHIT KUMAR
Adv. ABHIMANYU SHARMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.J AND K GRAMEEN BANK, TH. CHAIRMAN, JAMMU AND OTHERS
Case History
-
29-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
29-Jun-2026
For Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rahul Bharti
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rahul BhartiView PDF
Case Summary: WP(C) 1221/2026 Rohit Kumar, a Manager at J&K Grameen Bank, challenged his removal order through a writ petition after his appeal against dismissal was rejected by the Bank Chairman. The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir issued notice to respondents and adjourned the case to 29.06.2026, directing the petitioner to furnish registered postal covers for service within seven days. The petition seeks quashment of the removal order and reinstatement with consequential benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/1221/2026
Case Summary: WP(C) 1221/2026 Rohit Kumar, a Manager at J&K Grameen Bank, challenged his removal order through a writ petition after his appeal against dismissal was rejected by the Bank Chairman. The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir issued notice to respondents and adjourned the case to 29.06.2026, directing the petitioner to furnish registered postal covers for service within seven days. The petition seeks quashment of the removal order and reinstatement with consequential benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts