QURAT UL AIN AND ANOTHER AKARSHAN MAGOTRA vs UT OF J AND K TH. PRINCIPAL ECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS Advocate - MONIKA KOHLI — WP(C)/1040/2026

Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 1A. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 17-Apr-2026

CNR: JKHC020020952026

Filing Number

WP(C)/1549/2026

Filing Date

17-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/1040/2026

Registration Date

17-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohd. Yousuf Wani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohd. Yousuf Wani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB OTHER WRIT PETITIONS ( 101 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS SEEKING PROTECTION ORDERS ( 23 )

Judicial Branch

OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 226-Section103 Section 1A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.QURAT UL AIN AND ANOTHER AKARSHAN MAGOTRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UT OF J AND K TH. PRINCIPAL ECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS Advocate - MONIKA KOHLI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohd. Yousuf WaniView PDF

    Case Summary: WP(C) 1040/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir disposed of the petition by directing official respondents to ensure no unjustified harassment of two major adults who married against family wishes and face threats from relatives. However, the court clarified this order does not validate the marriage's legality under Personal Law, leaving parents and siblings free to challenge it before a civil court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    For Admission Before Notice

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/1040/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(C) 1040/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir disposed of the petition by directing official respondents to ensure no unjustified harassment of two major adults who married against family wishes and face threats from relatives. However, the court clarified this order does not validate the marriage's legality under Personal Law, leaving parents and siblings free to challenge it before a civil court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case