SHAFIEQ AHMED AND ANOTHER AZMAT ULLAH PARIHAR vs UT OF J AND K TH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS Advocate - MONIKA KOHLI — WP(C)/1023/2026

Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 1A. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 17-Apr-2026

CNR: JKHC020020612026

Filing Number

WP(C)/1519/2026

Filing Date

16-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/1023/2026

Registration Date

16-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria Kazmi

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria Kazmi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SB OTHER WRIT PETITIONS ( 101 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS SEEKING PROTECTION ORDERS ( 23 )

Judicial Branch

OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 226-Section103 Section 1A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHAFIEQ AHMED AND ANOTHER AZMAT ULLAH PARIHAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UT OF J AND K TH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS Advocate - MONIKA KOHLI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Moksha Khajuria KazmiView PDF

    Case Summary: WP(C) 1023/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir directed state authorities to provide adequate police protection to two adult petitioners who married on 13.04.2026 according to Islamic law and faced threats of violence from relatives opposing the marriage. The court clarified that this protection order does not validate the marriage or majority status and authorities may still investigate other criminal cases against the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    For Admission Before Notice

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/1023/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(C) 1023/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir directed state authorities to provide adequate police protection to two adult petitioners who married on 13.04.2026 according to Islamic law and faced threats of violence from relatives opposing the marriage. The court clarified that this protection order does not validate the marriage or majority status and authorities may still investigate other criminal cases against the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case